Pffft. That impressed in Arequipa.
And despite the very Vargas Llosa well aware that their prize is literature and not by political ideology, then we see the rights (they call themselves "liberals" and accept that they are, but liberalism is an ideology mostly right-wing , even though they sound like them rudely) say silly things like "[t] he Nobel Prize Vargas Llosa is great news [...] because in our countries, Vargas Llosa is not politically correct" ( Jorge Fernández Menéndez , Excelsior , 08/10 ), or that "represents our liberal tradition" (Christopher Domínguez Michael, Reform, 10/10), or "[i] n an environment where most of the intellectuals of the region gave up early on any kind of criticism of the Cuban process and its powerful leader, Mario Vargas Llosa was part of that small band who knew how to safeguard concepts like freedom of expression, pluralism, tolerance, human rights and democracy "( Ariel Gonzalez, Millennium , 09/10 ), that maybe they are true but are not relevant at all.
And across the street, we see the lefties whining because the Swedish Academy sold to Capital or Empire or Neoliberalism or as you say now (see the comments of the idiots in the note La Jornada , which is unreasonably Policy section): the same fetish to the Nobel, but in reverse. At least the Cuban dictatorship had the good taste to recognize that he deserves the award even though the man is a reactionary bourgeois, imperialist and oppressive enemy of the peoples of the world (La Jornada , 09/10). Again, maybe all this is true but has no relevance in the context of the Nobel Prize for Literature.
What Vargas Llosa's work was shaped by their political ideology, and transmitted? Sale: I respond that ideology affects only the content, not form, which is what produces the aesthetic feeling that all work art to produce. And that is what award in Stockholm, aesthetic feelings, no political convictions.
Anything else is non sequitur .
0 comments:
Post a Comment